At the press club kapihan (left to right): Emil Guillermo, Arnold Pedrigal, Esther Chavez, Prof. Debra Nebreda, Ret. Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, Rene Ciria Cruz, Mark Alegre, Prof. Willie Britt and Jossie Alegre. PHOTO BY MANDY CHAVEZ
Read more: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/103591/maj-gen-taguba-others-tackle-ethics-in-political-office-at-press-club-panel#ixzz3ABpYxYeS
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
SAN FRANCISCO, California – Spurred by recent corruption scandals in the California state legislature and the upcoming statewide elections, the Philippine American Press Club held a kapihan on ”Ethics and Politics,” April 26 at Golden Gate University.
Ret. Major General Antonio Taguba, U.S. Army, who exposed official culpability in the Abu Ghraib tortures in Iraq started the discussion by distributing an official guide on conduct by government executives and explaining how even stricter rules applied in the military.
Esther Chavez, president of the Philippine American Press Club, had set the tone in her welcome by quoting German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who said that “in law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty even if he only thinks of doing so.”
Raymond Buenaventura, Daly City Councilman, former mayor, and candidate for Judge in the San Mateo County Superior Court, explained that having to raise money for one’s candidacy places big pressures on a candidate and increases the temptation to give in to donors’ narrow agendas.
David Chiu echoed the same frustration and pressure for so-called pay to play transactions between elected officials and private interests. Chiu is president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and candidate for California State Legislature to represent San Francisco’s 17th Assembly District.
Chiu said the country needed electoral reforms including public financing of campaigns to eliminate transactional relationships in politics and stressed the importance of transparency in government affairs. He also described examples of the successful use of coalitions among groups that have succeeded in overcoming the power of huge donations from the wealthy.
Discussants were Dr. Willie Britt, adjunct professor of government, business and society at GGU EMPA Program, Prof. Debra Nebreda, adjunct professor of public finance and Budgeting at GGU and Rene Ciria Cruz, US Bureau Chief of Inquirer.net. Emil Guillermo, columnist and former NPR anchor was moderator.
Guillermo stated that the discussion was taking place on the heels of three state senators, including Sen. Leland Yee, coming under a cloud on allegations of corruption in office.
He also noted that the US Supreme Court had lately ruled as constitutional corporate donations and unlimited personal contributions to candidates, which critics say raises even more the power of money in determining winners and their subsequent policies.
Professor Britt commented that the moral compass within each individual is ultimately the deciding factor in one’s action. “There has to be individual / self-accountability. This has to come from education, examples, practice, role models and faith,” he said.
Professor Nebreda commented that the moral compass has been skewed for many reasons. “It includes the appearances and perceptions of misconduct by very visible officials, lack of or unfulfilled expectations of parents for themselves and/or of their children, and differences of values or erroneous understanding of the ethics of others.”
Inquirer US Bureau Chief Rene Ciria Cruz said that individual responsibility wasn’t enough as politicians have different moral compasses. “There must also be some coercive force that can put them all in line.” He reiterated Chiu’s call for electoral reform and full and exclusive public financing of campaigns to level the playing field, remove fundraising pressures on candidates and to lessen the temptation to commit “quid pro quos.”
The discussion segued into how Filipino Americans could harness their numbers to become a solid and influential political block, Filipinos being the biggest Asian community in California and second nationwide. Coalescing with other minorities, encouraging Filipinos to run for office and increasing voter registration were among the suggestions.
Joaquin “Jay” Gonzalez III, Mayor George Christopher Professor of Government and Society at the Edward S. Ageno School of Business of Golden Gate University in San Francisco, California and chair of GGU’s Department of Public Administration had suggested the panel discussion to the press club and quickly offered the university as venue.
(Jafilam dela Cruz, president of the Filipino American Society of Architects and Engineers (FASAE), contributed to this report.)
Source: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/103591/maj-gen-taguba-others-tackle-ethics-in-political-office-at-press-club-panel#ixzz3ABpA1fbZ
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Hello, after reading this amazing post i am also cheerful to share my
knowledge here with mates.
At the moment the Advocate General here in the UK is iiitstvgaenng whether the Binyam Mohammed case should be referred to the Director for Public Prosecutions, and people are pushing for a judicial inquiry. Direct evidence of the involvement of high-level officials has not yet been found, but it seems reasonable that if there was any, then it will come out once the MI5 men who colluded in Binyam Mohammed’s torture are put under the microscope. If all else fails, there is still the European Court of Human Rights Binyam Mohammed can claim locus standi under right of residence and being a victim of state action, and there are no derogations under Art. 3 of the ECHR the prohibition of torture, which was incorporated into UK law by statute in 1998.I have to say though, I was deeply disappointed by a BBC interview with the current foreign minister, David Milliband, who was allowed to drone on about how this government does not condone torture without being pressed to ask whether anyone in the government actually knew that torture was being carried out by the United States. Of course, he denied any knowledge of involvement. My great fear is that this will be swept out of public view by the current economic crisis, and then buried and forgotten. It must not be.Really, as someone who was willing to speak up for the war on terror, and as someone who supports a continued aggressive engagement with terrorism, it was a true shock to realise what was being done in our name. Yes, in the past, especially during the troubles in Northern Ireland, there were cases like The killings on the rock’, or the collusion cases, but these always seemed to be the result of local decisions and not those coming from the government as a whole. Now we have evidence that men were tortured using techniques designed not to extract information but to extract false confessions, in circumstances which would require higher approval, and which very well may have led to disastrous decisions being made on incorrect information. Methods of brutality which render Britain and America’s names mud, and the airy pronunciamentos of our combined leadership as to their respect for life and liberty so much meaningless twaddle.
I couldn’t agree more with your asssesment. This is about precedent. This could happen again if it is not responsibly and legally addressed. The problem I see is that some decisions may eventually get to the Supremes, and with the current alignment I am afraid that things might go horribly wrong once it gets there. The Bush/Cheney team had some serious forethought working on this one. Timing is all-important here, and I’d say that Halder and the Justice folks are on to this one. It looks as if Ginsberg might be leaving, though her replacement would not change the numbers. This might take awhile, though I must believe that it is moving in the proper legal direction. That’s the reason Cheney’s coming out of his hole. If his intention is to scare everyone, as he has done so effectively in the past, then he is sorely mistaken. His harangues have exposed him even more. Very, very odd man. Criminal, too. (How long ago do you think he shredded his passport?)But I also believe that many of the lower tier personal need to be vigorously prosecuted, especially those who greased the legal skids. There are new Yoos in the wings, and they too need to get the message that the work of dismantling the Constitution has serious penalties. Being a stooge, albeit a smart one, is still being a stooge.